《EFL學(xué)習(xí)中的語言石化研究》從20世紀(jì)70年代至今,第二語言習(xí)得研究蓬勃發(fā)展,取得了許多重要的研究成果,已經(jīng)成為一門獨(dú)立的學(xué)科。其中,經(jīng)典的詞素研究和加拿大浸入式教學(xué)研究,不僅確立了第二語言習(xí)得研究作為一門獨(dú)立學(xué)科的地位,而且對(duì)第二語言學(xué)習(xí)產(chǎn)生了巨大的影響。人們開始更客觀、更具體地研究第二語言習(xí)得,不僅研究第二語言教學(xué)方法,而且研究教學(xué)環(huán)境、教學(xué)內(nèi)容和學(xué)習(xí)者的學(xué)習(xí)動(dòng)機(jī)、認(rèn)知風(fēng)格、學(xué)習(xí)策略等,大大推動(dòng)了第二語言習(xí)得研究。
第二語言教學(xué)經(jīng)歷了一百多年的變遷,期間,第二語言教學(xué)的發(fā)展幾乎被等同于第二語言教學(xué)法的發(fā)展。不同的語言認(rèn)識(shí)論、語言習(xí)得理論和教學(xué)理念,促使第二語言教學(xué)法不斷涌現(xiàn)、頻繁更新。
從20世紀(jì)70年代至今,第二語言習(xí)得研究蓬勃發(fā)展,取得了許多重要的研究成果,已經(jīng)成為一門獨(dú)立的學(xué)科。其中,經(jīng)典的詞素研究和加拿大浸入式教學(xué)研究,不僅確立了第二語言習(xí)得研究作為一門獨(dú)立學(xué)科的地位,而且對(duì)第二語言學(xué)習(xí)產(chǎn)生了巨大的影響。人們開始更客觀、更具體地研究第二語言習(xí)得,不僅研究第二語言教學(xué)方法,而且研究教學(xué)環(huán)境、教學(xué)內(nèi)容和學(xué)習(xí)者的學(xué)習(xí)動(dòng)機(jī)、認(rèn)知風(fēng)格、學(xué)習(xí)策略等,大大推動(dòng)了第二語言習(xí)得研究。
語言石化研究就是在這一大環(huán)境下產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展的。在第二語言習(xí)得研究領(lǐng)域,語言石化一般指在有持續(xù)的語言輸入、足夠的學(xué)習(xí)動(dòng)機(jī)和充分的練習(xí)機(jī)會(huì)的情況下,發(fā)生的語言發(fā)展停滯現(xiàn)象。語言石化現(xiàn)象,一直是第二語言習(xí)得研究的研究熱點(diǎn)。人們從普通語言學(xué)、社會(huì)語言學(xué)、心理語言學(xué)神經(jīng)生理學(xué)的角度,探討石化現(xiàn)象的產(chǎn)生原因和防治策略,取得了許多可喜的成果。
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Overview
1.2 Background of Fossilization Research
1.3 Significance of the Research
1.4 Organization of the Book
Chapter 2 A Theoretical Study on Fossilization
2.1 Introduction
2.2 The Recent Developments of Fossilization Research
2.2.1 Defining Fossilization
2.2.2 Behavioral Reflexes of Fossilization
2.2.3 Causal Variables of Fossilization
2.2.4 Difficulties in Research on Fossilization
2.2.5 Problems in Fossilization Studies
2.3 Fossilization or Stabilization as the Object of Emvirical Studies of Fossilization
2.4 Fossilization from Emergentist and Connectionist Perspectives
2.4.1 Emergentist Approaches to Language and SLA
2.4.2 Connectionism
2.4.3 Rational Contingency Learning
2.4.3.1 The Design of an Optimal Processor
2.4.3.2 The Rational Analysis of Learning and Memory
2.4.3.3 Contingency: AP
2.4.3.4 Irrationalities as the Results of the Effects of Attention
2.5 Attention and Noticing Hypothesis
2.6 Focus on Form
2.7 Conceptual Framework of the Present Study and Research Questions
Chapter 3 Research on the Existence of Fossilization and Stabilization
A Questionnaire Study
3.1 Introduction
3.2 L2 learners' Serf-Report about Fossilization and Stabilization
3.2.1 Participants
3.2.2 Methods and Materials
3.2.3 Procedures
3.2.4 Results and Discussions
3.2.4.1 Handling Irrelevant Data
3.2.4.2 Motivation Types
3.2.4.3 Subject-Predicate Agreement
3.2.4.4 Inflection of Plurals
3.2.4.5 Inflection of Past Tense Predicate
3.2.4.6 Distinguishing "He" and "She"
3.2.4.7 Articles
3.2.4.8 General Impression on IL Development
3.2.4.9 Multiple Choice Items
3.2.4.10 Open-Ended Questions
3.2.4.11 Summary
3.3 Foreign Language Teachers' Observation of Fossilization and Stabilization
3.3.1 Participants
3.3.2 Methods and Materials
3.3.3 Procedures
3.3.4 A Pilot Study
3.3.5 Results and Discussions
3.3.5.1 General Evaluation of Development and Cessation
3.3.5.2 Specific Features
3.3.5.3 The Participants' Feedback on Their Students' Mistakes
3.3.5.4 Multiple Choice Items
3.3.5.5 The Open-Ended Items
3.3.5.6 Summary
Chapter 4 Research on the Existence of Fossilization and Stabilization:
A Pseudo-longitudinal Study
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Participants
4.3 Methods and Materials
4.4 Procedures and Coding
4.5 A Pilot Study
4.6 Results and Discussions
4.6.1 The Grammaticality Judgment Task
4.6.2 The Dictogloss Task
4.6.3 The Elicited Imitation Task
4.6.4 Summary
Chapter 5 The Effects of Different Types of Feedback on Stabilized Features
5. 1 Introduction
5.2 Participants
5.3 Methods and Materials
5.4 Procedures and Coding
5.5 Results and Discussions
5.5.1 The Pretest
5.5.2 The Instructional Intervention Process
5.5.2. 1 Past Tense Marking
5.5.2. 2 Third Person Singular Marking
5.5.2.3 Articles
5.5.3 The Immediate Posttest
5.5. g The Delayed Posttest
5.5.5 Summary
Chapter 6 The Effects of Input Enhancement on Stabilized Features
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Participants
6.3 Methods and Materials
6.4 Procedures and Coding
6.5 Results and Discussions
6.5.1 The Pretest
6.5.2 The Immediate Posttest
6.5.3 The Delayed Posttest
6.5.4 Summary
Chanter 7 The Effects of Enhanced Output on Stabilized Features
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Participants
7.3 Methods and Materials
7.4 Procedures and Coding
7.5 Results and Discussions
7.5.The First Pretest
7.5.The Second Pretest
7.5.The Immediate Posttest
7.5.The Delayed Posttest
7.5.Summary
Chapter 8 Conclusion
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Results Summary
8.3 Contributions of the Research
8.3.1 Theoretical Significance
8.3.2 Pedagogical Implications
8.3.3 Methodological Significance
8.4 Limitations of the Research
8.5 Recommendations for Further Research
8.6 Conclusion
Bibliography
Appendix Ⅰ Questionnaire for Students
Appendix Ⅱ Questionnaire for Teachers
Appendix Ⅲ Material for the Pseudo-Longitudinal Sludy
While it is surely the case that some people are more articulate thanothers in using their Ll,all children with normal faculties and given normalcircumstances master their mother tongue. People marvel at the easeand rapidity with which children acquire their L1. Standing in contrastwith L1 acquisition,SEA does not often result in the outcome of languagemastery. Furthermore, there is a much broader range of language profi-ciency achieved among L2 learners than first. The issue of differentialsuccess involves not only inter-learner view but also intra-learnerview. The ultimate attainment of L2 learners end up with differential ter-minal IL states and for a given learner, part of his IL system ceases to de-velop. In SLA research, such kind of failure has largely been dealt withunder the construct of "fossilization" ( Selinker, 1972).
Although SLA researchers have studied fossilization since Selinkerproposed the construct in 1972, there is no universally acknowledged defi-nition of fossilization. A wide range of cessation of second or foreign lan-guage learning is reported under the construct of fossilization in all kindsof learuing conditions. Researchers in this field attribute different beha-vioral reflexes to fossilization, explain fossilization from different perspec-tives, and make efforts to solve the problem of fossilization with differentmeasures. Consequently, as Long( 2003, p. 492 ) asserts, numerous studiesover the past 30 years purporting to demonstrate and explain fossilizationmay be questioned for their defects in describing fossilization, choosingsubjects, collecting data, and conducting analysis. The chaotic situation offossilization study, on one hand, calls for a paradigm and theoreticaland methodological frameworks.
……