個體性文化體系的失度——哈代小說主人公悲劇根源研究
定 價:56 元
- 作者:劉磊
- 出版時間:2022/7/1
- ISBN:9787305258978
- 出 版 社:南京大學(xué)出版社
- 中圖法分類:I561.074
- 頁碼:220
- 紙張:
- 版次:1
- 開本:16開
悲劇維度是英國作家托馬斯·哈代小說最重要的維度之一。對于主人公悲劇根源的探索有助于研究哈代小說的思想內(nèi)涵及其歷史意義。哈代小說主人公的悲劇根源(即他們的災(zāi)難性結(jié)局的根源)可以從文化角度來闡釋。在雷蒙·威廉斯文化唯物主義理論的基礎(chǔ)上,個體性文化體系的合度與失度之闡釋框架可以發(fā)展出來,用于托馬斯·哈代小說主人公悲劇根源的研究。在一定意義上,個體性文化體系的失度(簡稱為文化失度)導(dǎo)致了小說主人公的災(zāi)難性結(jié)局。該專著從個體性文化體系的失度的視角研究哈代悲劇,可以對現(xiàn)代性發(fā)展過程中的道德、性格、身份和價值觀等諸多維度給予闡釋。
劉磊,男,1982年出生,中國民航大學(xué)外國語學(xué)院副教授,上海外國語大學(xué)英語語言文學(xué)專業(yè)博士。主要研究方向為英美文學(xué)與文學(xué)理論。近年主要學(xué)術(shù)論著:《英美文學(xué)中人文情結(jié)的嬗變》;《美國“垮掉派”詩歌研究——認(rèn)知詩學(xué)視閾》[第二作者]。現(xiàn)階段主講或曾經(jīng)主講“大學(xué)英語”、“高級英語”、“中西文化比較”、“基礎(chǔ)英語寫作與交流”(博士生公共英語)等課程。
Acknowledgments
摘要
Abstract
Introduction
0.1LiteratureReview
0.2TheMethodologyandOrganizationoftheBook
ChapterOneCulturalInappositenessintheDimensionofMorality
1.1TheNative:TheConflictbetweentheSufficiencyandtheModerationofAltruism
1.2TheNative:TheConflictBetweentheAffirmativeMoralityandtheNegativeMoralityMechanism
1.3Tess:TheConflictBetweentheSpiritualizedMoralityandtheMaterializedMoralityMechanism
1.4Jude:TheConflictBetweentheContent-directedMoralityandtheForm-directedMoralityMechanism
1.5TheIdeasaboutMoralityinTheNativeandTheirHistoricalSignificance
1.6TheIdeasaboutMoralityinTessandJudeTogetherwithTheirHistoricalSignificance
ChapterTwoCulturalInappositenessintheDimensionofDisposition
2.1TheMayor:TheNegativetendency
2.2TheMayor:TheMood-basedAggressiveness
2.3Tess:TheImbalanceofPsychologicalRhythm
2.4TheIdeaaboutDispositioninTheMayorandItsHistoricalSignificance
2.5TheIdeaaboutDispositioninTessandItsHistoricalSignificance
ChapterThreeCulturalInappositenessintheDimensionofIdentity
3.1Tess:TheConflictBetweentheIdentityofExplicitEqualityandtheExplicitIdentityInequality
3.2Tess:TheConflictBetweentheIdentityofImplicitEqualityandtheImplicitIdentityInequality
3.3TheMayor:TheConflictBetweentheIdentityasaPatriarchandtheModernizedIdentityMechanism
3.4TheIdeasaboutIdentityinTessandTheirHistoricalSignificance
3.5TheIdeaaboutIdentityinTheMayorandItsHistoricalSignificance
ChapterFourCulturalInappositenessintheDimensionofValueConcept
4.1Jude:TheConflictbetweentheValueConceptofKnowledgeandtheSynchronicValueHegemony
4.2Jude:TheConflictbetweentheValueConceptofloveandtheDiachronicValueHegemony
4.3TheNative:TheConflictBetweentheExterior-orientedValueConceptandtheInterior-orientedValueMechanism
4.4Tess:TheConflictBetweentheSpiritualizedValueConceptandtheMaterializedValueMechanism
4.5TheIdeasaboutValueConceptinJudeandTheirHistoricalSignificance
4.6TheIdeasaboutValueConceptinTheNativeandTessTogetherwithTheirHistoricalSignificance
ChapterFiveTheHistoricalSignificanceoftheOverallFormatofCulturalInappositenessLeadingtoTragedies
5.1LiteraryInterpretationoftheFatalismandPessimismofArthurSchopenhauer
5.2LiteraryInterpretationoftheIdeasofReformismofJohnRuskinandAugusteComte
Conclusion
Bibliography