<span id="r8prx"></span>
|
關(guān)于我們
 書單推薦 新書推薦 |
知識產(chǎn)權(quán)案例精選(2011-2012) 
定 價：88 元
9 7 0 8 2 7 6 5 0 1 4 3 8 
本書從上海法院2011 -2012年受理及審結(jié)的數(shù)千件知識產(chǎn)權(quán)案件中精選出具有一定代表性與指導(dǎo)性的案例。每個案例均設(shè)提要、案情、審判、評析四大部分。每個案例在提要部分對案例涉及的主要問題進行歸納，在案情部分介紹基本案情，在審判部分詳細介紹審判理由和判決結(jié)果。評析部分是在概述案件事實的基礎(chǔ)上，詳細闡述判決的法理和法律依據(jù)。本書為中英文對照讀本。
一、著作權(quán)民事糾紛案件
1.處分未來作品權(quán)利合同的效力判斷與違約責(zé)任 1 ──上海玄霆娛樂信息科技有限公司與王鐘等著作權(quán)合同糾紛案 2.網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商對其用戶的反復(fù)侵權(quán)行為負有注意義務(wù) 11 ──莊則棟等與上海隱志網(wǎng)絡(luò)科技有限公司 侵害信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)糾紛案 3.動畫角色造型著作權(quán)歸屬的認定 21 ──胡進慶等與上海美術(shù)電影制片廠著作權(quán)權(quán)屬糾紛案 4.廣告語是否構(gòu)成作品的認定 30 ──陳俞吉等與上海月星控股集團有限公司等著作權(quán)侵權(quán)糾紛案 5.網(wǎng)站ICP備案信息的證據(jù)效力與認定 36 ──上海觀視文化傳播有限公司與上海北銘高強度鋼材有限公司等 侵害作品信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)糾紛案 6.搜索引擎服務(wù)商的侵權(quán)責(zé)任認定 43 ──上海玄霆娛樂信息科技有限公司與北京百度網(wǎng)訊科技 有限公司等侵犯著作財產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛案 二、商標(biāo)民事糾紛案件 7.網(wǎng)站、宣傳冊廣告語中擅自使用他人馳名商標(biāo)行為的定性 50 ──卡地亞國際有限公司與佛山市三水區(qū)銘坤陶瓷有限公司等 侵害商標(biāo)權(quán)及不正當(dāng)競爭糾紛案 8.商標(biāo)指示性合理使用的司法認定 61 ──立邦涂料（中國）有限公司與上海展進貿(mào)易有限公司等 侵害商標(biāo)專用權(quán)糾紛案 9.商標(biāo)侵權(quán)判定中對商標(biāo)近似的判斷 70 ──拜爾斯道夫股份有限公司與上海語嫣化妝品有限公司等 侵害商標(biāo)專用權(quán)糾紛案 10.馳名商標(biāo)司法認定的條件和因素 78 ──黛爾吉奧品牌有限公司等與肖紹力等侵犯商標(biāo)專用權(quán)糾紛 侵犯商標(biāo)專用權(quán)及不正當(dāng)競爭糾紛案 11.馳名商標(biāo)認定的必要性判斷 86 ──英特爾公司與深圳市因特佳數(shù)碼科技有限公司等 侵犯商標(biāo)專用權(quán)糾紛案 12.組合商標(biāo)近似性比對中的“要部”選擇 93 ──諾基亞公司與無錫金悅科技有限公司侵犯商標(biāo)專用權(quán)糾紛案 13.網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺經(jīng)營者幫助侵權(quán)的司法認定 99 ──衣念(上海)時裝貿(mào)易有限公司與浙江淘寶網(wǎng)絡(luò)有限公司等 侵犯商標(biāo)專用權(quán)糾紛案 14.作為商標(biāo)使用在商標(biāo)侵權(quán)判斷中的作用 106 ──霍尼韋爾國際公司與上海蓋里特渦輪增壓器系統(tǒng)有限公司等 侵犯商標(biāo)專用權(quán)及不正當(dāng)競爭糾紛案 15.網(wǎng)絡(luò)域名侵犯注冊商標(biāo)專用權(quán)的司法認定 120 ──施華洛世奇有限公司與王晨昀等侵犯商標(biāo)專用權(quán)糾紛案 16.分銷商搶注商標(biāo)的法律適用 130 ──雅培糖尿病護理公司與上海和亭商貿(mào)有限公司等 三、專利民事糾紛案件 17.權(quán)利要求用語存在明顯錯誤時如何確定專利權(quán)的保護范圍 137 ──北京西科盛世通酒店會展設(shè)備制造有限公司 與廣州市番禺區(qū)恒美酒店有限公司等侵害發(fā)明專利權(quán)糾紛案 18.專利等同侵權(quán)的判定 147 ──寧波悅祥機械制造有限公司與上海昶意機械制造有限公司 侵害發(fā)明專利權(quán)糾紛案 19.權(quán)利要求中功能性特征內(nèi)容的確定 162 ──曲聲波與新世界（中國）科技傳媒有限公司等 侵害實用新型專利權(quán)糾紛案 20.具有組合關(guān)系的外觀設(shè)計之侵權(quán)比對 176 ──上海稚宜樂商貿(mào)有限公司與楊磊真等 侵害外觀設(shè)計專利權(quán)糾紛案 21.新產(chǎn)品制造方法發(fā)明專利侵權(quán)糾紛案件中“新產(chǎn)品”的舉證責(zé)任分配 182 ──3M公司與浙江道明反光材料有限公司侵犯發(fā)明專利權(quán)糾紛案 四、不正當(dāng)競爭糾紛案件 22.就司法未決事實向行業(yè)內(nèi)特定對象陳述是否構(gòu)成商業(yè)詆毀的認定 188 ──宣達實業(yè)集團有限公司與孟莫克公司等商業(yè)詆毀糾紛案 23.仿冒在先商業(yè)標(biāo)識的侵權(quán)判斷 196 ──張盛與上海記盛餐飲管理有限公司等不正當(dāng)競爭糾紛案 24.網(wǎng)站用戶注冊信息數(shù)據(jù)庫的商業(yè)秘密性質(zhì)認定 205 ──衢州萬聯(lián)網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)有限公司與周慧民等侵犯商業(yè)秘密糾紛案 25.刑事判決認定的犯罪金額對確定民事侵權(quán)損害賠償?shù)淖饔?212 ──梯愛司表面處理技術(shù)(上海)有限公司與魏成剛等 侵害商業(yè)秘密糾紛案 26.知名商品特有包裝裝潢權(quán)利的認定與保護 221 ──梅西斯有限公司與深圳市米菲體育用品有限公司等 27.影視劇植入廣告的辨識及虛假宣傳的認定 229 ──北京珂蘭信鉆網(wǎng)絡(luò)科技有限公司與上海辛迪加影視有限公司等 不正當(dāng)競爭糾紛案 28.名人姓名中財產(chǎn)權(quán)益的司法保護路徑 238 ──岳彤宇與周立波網(wǎng)絡(luò)域名權(quán)屬糾紛案 29.擅自將他人企業(yè)名稱注冊為域名應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)相應(yīng)的民事責(zé)任 246 ──上海長途汽車客運總站有限公司與銘萬信息技術(shù)有限公司等 計算機網(wǎng)絡(luò)域名糾紛案 五、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事案件 30.商標(biāo)犯罪中故意售假、涉案商品真?zhèn)渭颁N售金額的認定 253 ──陳有志銷售假冒注冊商標(biāo)的商品罪案 31.侵犯著作權(quán)罪的認定 260 ──傅旭義等人侵犯著作權(quán)罪案 32.利用“外掛”制售網(wǎng)絡(luò)游戲虛擬貨幣行為的刑事責(zé)任認定 266 ──余剛等侵犯著作權(quán)罪案 33.非法制造他人注冊商標(biāo)行為的認定及制造數(shù)量的計算規(guī)則 280 ──上海鐳友實業(yè)有限公司等非法制造注冊商標(biāo)標(biāo)識罪案 34.外國作品能否作為侵犯著作權(quán)罪的犯罪對象 288 ──游海豹等侵犯著作權(quán)罪案 35.銷售侵權(quán)復(fù)制品罪的認定 293 ──張樂等侵犯著作權(quán)罪、銷售侵權(quán)復(fù)制品罪案 36.網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下侵犯著作權(quán)罪的司法認定 301 ──閻鵬侵犯著作權(quán)罪案 六、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政案件 37.類似商品的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn) 307 ──浙江梅泰克諾新型建筑板材有限公司不服工商銷案決定案 38.知識產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)行政保護措施的司法審查 320 ──上海貝邦進出口有限公司不服海關(guān)臨時扣押產(chǎn)品決定案 Contents I. Civil Dispute Cases over Copyright 1.Judgment on Effect and Liability for Breach of Contract Regarding the Rights to Dispose Future Works 1 — Shanghai Xuanting Entertainment Information Technology Co., Ltd.v. Wang Zhong, et al Dispute over Copyright Contract 2.Network Service Provider has the Duty of Care to Its Users’ Repeated Infringement 21 —Zhuang Zedong et al v. Shanghai Source Internet Technology Co., Ltd. Dispute Over Infringement on the Right to Network Dissemination of Information 3.Determination on Ownership of Copyright of Cartoon Character Images 37 -- Hu Jinqing, et al and Shanghai Animation Film Studio Dispute over Copyright Ownership 4.Determination on whether Slogans Constitute Works 52 -- Chen Yuji et al v. Shanghai Yuexing Holding Group Co., Ltd. et al Dispute over Copyright Infringement 5.Evidentiary Effect of Website ICP Filing Information and Determination 62 -- Shanghai Guanshi Culture Communication Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Beiming High Strength Steel Co., Ltd., et al Dispute over Infringement on Right to Network Dissemination of Information of Works 6.Determination of Infringement Liability of Search Engine Providers 74 ──Shanghai Xuanting Entertainment Information Technology Co., Ltd. v. Beijing Baidu Network Information Technology Co., Ltd. et al Property Right Infringement 7.Determination of Unauthorized Use of Well-Known Trademarks in Websites and Pamphlets 78 ── Cartier International N.V. v. Foshan M?K Ceramics Co., Ltd. in Sanshui District et al Trademark Right Infringement and Unfair Competition 8.Judicial Determination of Nominative Fair Use of Trademarks 86 ——Nippon Paint (China) Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Zhanjin Trade Co., Ltd. et al Infringement on Exclusive Right to Use Trademarks 9.Judgment on Trademark Similarity in Determination of Trademark Infringement 93 ──Beiersdorf AG v. Shanghai Yuyan Cosmetic Company et al Infringement on Exclusive Right to Use a Trademark 10.Conditions and Factors for Judicial Recognition of Well-known Trademarks 100 ─ Diageo Brands BV et al v. Xiao Shaolim et al Infringement on Exclusive Right to Use a Trademark 11.Judgment on the Necessity of Well-known Trademark Recognition 107 ──Intel Corporation v. Shenzhen Inteljet Digital Technology Co., Ltd., et al Infringement on Exclusive Right to Use a Trademark 12.“Integral Part” Selection of Combined Trademarks for Similarity Comparison 113 ──Nokia Corporation v. Wuxi Jinyue Technology Co., Ltd. Infringement on Exclusive Right to Use a Trademark 13.Judicial Determination of Contributory Infringement by Online Trade Platform Operator 118 ──E?Land Fashion (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.v. Zhejiang Taobao Network Co., Ltd. et al Infringement on Exclusive Right to Use Trademarks 14.Effect of Trademark Use in the Determination of Trademark Infringement 125 ──Honeywell International Inc. v. Shanghai Gerritt Turbocharger System Co., Ltd. et al Infringement on Exclusive Right to Use Trademarks and Unfair Competition 15.Judicial Determination of Infringement of Exclusive Right to Use Registered Trademark by 16.Network Domain Name 137 ──Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft v. Wang Chenyun et al Infringement on Exclusive Right to Use Trademark 17.Application of Laws Concerning Rush Registration of Trademark by Distributors 144 ──Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. v. Shanghai Hotin Commercial Trading Co, Ltd. et al Infringement on Ownership of Exclusive Right to Use Trademarks 18.How to Define the Scope of Patent Right Protection Where There Are Obvious Errors in Wording of Claims 150 ──Beijing Sico-Sst Hospitality Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd. v. Guangzhou Fanyu Halmay Hotel Co., Ltd. et al Invention Patent Infringement 19.Determination on the Content of Functional Attributes in Claims 159 ── Qu Shengbo v. New World（China）Technology & Media Co., Ltd., et al. Infringement on Utility Model Patent 20.Comparison of the Infringement upon Appearance Designs with Composition 184 — Toyroyal (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. Yang Leizhen, et al. Infringement on Appearance Design Patent 21.Assignment of Burden of Proof on “New Product” in Disputes over Invention Patent Infringement on Manufacturing Method of New Product 194 — 3M Company v. Zhejiang Daoming Reflective Materials Co., Ltd. Infringement on Invention Patent 22.Ascertainment on Whether Stating Judicial Facts-in-issue to Specific Subject in the Industry Constitutes Commercial Defamation 205 ── Xuanda Industrial Group Co., Ltd. v. MECS, Inc., et al. Dispute over Commercial Defamation 23.Judgment on Infringement on Commercial Signs Counterfeited Beforehand 220 — Zhang Sheng v. JiSheng F&B Management Co., Ltd. Shanghai, et al. Dispute over Unfair Competition 24.Determination on Trade Secret of Database of Registration Information of Network Users 236 —Quzhou Wanlain Network Technology Co., Ltd. v. Zhou Huimin, etc. Infringement on Trade Secret 25.Role of Amount of Money of Crime Affirmed by Criminal Judgment in Determining on Compensation for Damage Caused by Civil Infringement 250 ──Techniques Surfaces Management (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. Wei Chenggang, et al. Dispute over Trade Secret Infringement 26.Determination on and Protection of Right to Special Packaging Decoration of Well-known Goods 266 —Mercis B.V. v. Shenzhen Minify Sport Goods Co., Ltd. et al. Dispute over Infringement on Exclusive Right to Use Trademark and Unfair Competition 27.Identification of Product Placement in Movies and Television Plays and Determination on False Propaganda 279 —Beijing Kela Diamond Network Technology Co., Ltd. v. China Syndication Entertainment Co., Ltd., et al. Dispute over Unfair Competition 28.Path to Juridical Protection of Property Right and Interests in Names of Celebrities 296 Yue Tongyu v. Zhou Libo Dispute over Infringement on Ownership of Network Domain Nam 29.Registering Other’s Enterprise Name as Domain Name Without Authorization Shall Bear Corresponding Civil Liabilities 309 ──Shanghai Long-distance Bus Station Co., Ltd. v. Mainone Information Technology Co., Ltd., et al. Dispute over Infringement on Network Domain Name 30.?Determination on Intentional Distribution of Counterfeited Products, Authenticity of Involved Commodities and Sales Amount 322 ── Crime of Chen Youzhi’s Distribution of Commodities Bearing Counterfeited Registered Trademarks 31.Determination on Crime of Infringement on Copyright 335 ──Fu Xuyi, et al Crime of Infringement on Copyright 32.The Ascertainment of Criminal Liability for Using "Plug-in" to Fabricate and Sell Online Game Virtual Currency 346 Copyright Infringement Committed by Yu Gang et al 33.Identification of the Act of Illegal Fabrication of Other’s Registered Trademark and the Computation Rule of Fabrication Quantity 369 — The Case of Illegal Fabrication of Registered Trademark Symbols by Shanghai Leiyou Industry Co., Ltd. et al 34.Whether A Foreign Work Can Be Accounted as the Object of Copyright Infringement 383 -- The Case of Copyright Infringement Committed by You Haibao et al 35.Identification of the Crime of Selling Infringing Duplicates 392 ─ The Case of Copyright Infringement and Selling Infringing Duplicates Committed by Zhang Le et al 36.Judicial Recognition of Copyright Infringement in Internet Environment 407 ─ The Case of Copyright Infringement Committed by Yan Peng 37.Criteria for Judging Similar Commodities 418 ─The Appeal of Zhejiang Metecno New Building Panels Co. Ltd. Against the Decision of the Administration of Industry and Commerce to Close the Case 38.The Judicial Review of the Customs' Administrative Measures of IPR Protection 441 ──The Case of the Refusal of Shanghai B&B Import & Export Co., Ltd. to Accept the Customs' Decision to Temporarily Detain the Products
你還可能感興趣
我要評論
|
