本書被公認(rèn)為是德國哲學(xué)家伊曼努爾·康德流傳最為廣泛,最具影響力的著作,同時(shí)也是整個(gè)西方哲學(xué)史上最重要和影響最深遠(yuǎn)的著作之一。初版于1781年,并于1787年再版的該書,常被稱做康德的“第一批判”,并與其后的《實(shí)踐理性批判》和《判斷力批判》并稱為康德“三大批判”。在這部西方哲學(xué)奠基式的著作中康德嘗試將理性主義和經(jīng)驗(yàn)主義接合起來,并以此反對(duì)大衛(wèi)·休謨徹底的經(jīng)驗(yàn)主義。
1 INTRODUCTION.
1.1 I. Of the difference between Pure and EmpiricalKnowledge
1.2 II. The Human Intellect, even in anUnphilosophical State, is in Possession of Certain Cognitions "apriori".
1.3 III. Philosophy stands in need of a Science whichshall Determine the Possibility, Principles, and Extent of HumanKnowledge "a priori"
1.4 IV. Of the Difference Between Analytical andSynthetical Judge-ments
1.5 V. In all Theoretical Sciences of Reason,Synthetical Judgements "a priori" are contained as Principles
1.6 VI. The Universal Problem of Pure Reason
1.7 VII. Idea and Division of a Particular Science,under the Name of a Critique of Pure Reason
2 TRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF ELEMENTS.
2.1 FIRST PART. TRANSCENDENTAL AESTHETIC
SECTION I. Of Space
SECTION II. Of Time
2.2 SECOND PART. TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC
INTRODUCTION. Idea of a TranscendentalLogic
I. Of Logic in General
1 INTRODUCTION.
1.1 I. Of the difference between Pure and EmpiricalKnowledge
1.2 II. The Human Intellect, even in anUnphilosophical State, is in Possession of Certain Cognitions "apriori".
1.3 III. Philosophy stands in need of a Science whichshall Determine the Possibility, Principles, and Extent of HumanKnowledge "a priori"
1.4 IV. Of the Difference Between Analytical andSynthetical Judge-ments
1.5 V. In all Theoretical Sciences of Reason,Synthetical Judgements "a priori" are contained as Principles
1.6 VI. The Universal Problem of Pure Reason
1.7 VII. Idea and Division of a Particular Science,under the Name of a Critique of Pure Reason
2 TRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF ELEMENTS.
2.1 FIRST PART. TRANSCENDENTAL AESTHETIC
SECTION I. Of Space
SECTION II. Of Time
2.2 SECOND PART. TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC
INTRODUCTION. Idea of a TranscendentalLogic
I. Of Logic in General
II. Of Transcendental Logic
III. Of the Division of General Logic intoAnalytic and Dialectic
IV. Of the Division of Transcendental Logic intoTranscendental Analytic and Dialectic.
TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC. FIRST DIVISION
BOOK I
CHAPTER I. Of the TranscendentalClue to the Discovery of all Pure Conceptions of theUnderstanding.
CHAPTER II Of the Deduction of thePure Conceptions of the Understanding
BOOK II. Analytic of Principles
CHAPTER I. Of the Schematism at ofthe Pure Conceptions of the Understanding
CHAPTER II. System of all Principlesof the Pure Understanding
CHAPTER III. Of the Ground of theDivision of all Objects into Phenomena and Noumena
TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC. SECOND DIVISION
TRANSCENDENTAL DIALECTIC.INTRODUCTION
I. Of Transcendental IllusoryAppearance.
II. Of Pure Reason as the Seat ofTranscendental Illusory Appearance
BOOK I. OF THE CONCEPTIONS OF PURE REASON
SECTION I Of Ideas in General
SECTION II. Of TranscendentalIdeas
SECTION III. System ofTranscendental Ideas.
BOOK II. OF THE DIALECTICAL PROCEDURE OF PUREREASON
CHAPTER I. Of the Paralogisms ofPure Reason
CHAPTER II. The Antinomy of PureReason.
CHAPTER III. The Ideal of PureReason.
3 TRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF METHOD.
3.1 CHAPTER I. The Discipline of Pure Reason
3.1.1 SECTION I. The Discipline of PureReason in the Sphere of Dogmatism
3.1.2 SECTION II. The Discipline of PureReason in Polemics
3.1.3 SECTION III. The Discipline of PureReason in Hypothesis
3.1.4 SECTION IV. The Discipline of PureReason in Relation to Proofs
3.2 CHAPTER II. The Canon of Pure Reason
3.2.1 SECTION I. Of the Ultimate End ofthe Pure Use of Reason
3.2.2 SECTION II. Of the Ideal of theSummum Bonum as a Determining Ground of the Ultimate End of PureReason
3.2.3 SECTION III. Of Opinion, Knowledge,and Belief
3.3 CHAPTER III. The Architectonic of PureReason
3.4 CHAPTER IV. The History of Pure Reason